Advisory Council on Public Records

Lord Rowlands: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the total amount of expenses claimed by members of the Advisory Council on Public Records in 2009-10.

Lord McNally: In 2009-10 there were 18 appointed members of the Advisory Council on Public Records. Their total travel and subsistence spend was £2,666.88.

Burial Law

Lord Clement-Jones: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have considered any reform of burial law in order to permit reuse of old graves for burial and to ease the financial burdens placed on local authorities in administering public cemeteries.

Lord McNally: We are currently considering whether to permit the reuse of old graves as a solution to the shortage of burial space in some areas. We recognise that such arrangements could relieve local authorities from the costs of acquiring and developing new land for burials. Authorities in London are already permitted, under provisions within the London Local Authorities Act 2007, to reuse old private graves.

Driving: Licences

Lord Lucas: To ask Her Majesty's Government on what elements of statute, regulation or case law the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency based its previous practice in relation to "Section 99 revocations" that drivers who failed to surrender their licences were entitled to continue to drive for 12 months; on what elements of statute, regulation or case law they base their current view that drivers have no entitlement; and what assessment they have made of the impact of this change.

Earl Attlee: Section 88 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 provides 12 months' cover to drive for those motorists who have previously held a valid licence and made a qualifying application which has been received by the Secretary of State. The legislation allows the driver to continue driving while they await receipt of the new licence.
	The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) had previously applied this concession to drivers whose licences had been revoked regardless of whether or not they had complied with the requirement under Section 99(3) of the Act to surrender the licence for endorsement of a conviction.
	The Home Office and the police challenged this view arguing that the 12-month concessionary period was never intended to cover those drivers who failed to comply with an order by the court for the driver to surrender their licence for endorsement. Following a review of the legislation, the Department for Transport has agreed with the Home Office's view that drivers who failed to surrender their licence for endorsement should not be covered to drive under Section 88 of the Act.
	The DVLA assessed the number of drivers affected and, in order to limit the impact, applied the change going forward to all drivers who failed to surrender their licences from 7 November 2010 rather than look at the whole population of drivers retrospectively.

Driving: Licences

Lord Lucas: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their estimate of the percentage of occasions when a driver will not find out about the requirement to surrender his licence until he receives a fines notice; how much time he will have after the receipt of that notice to surrender his licence; and what is their estimate of the time between the late surrender of a licence and the re-issue of a driver's licence.

Earl Attlee: The information requested in the first part of the Question is not available.
	A driver who has committed a motoring offence will generally be issued with a fixed penalty notice within 14 days of the offence being committed. This will inform the driver that they have 28 days to accept the penalty and surrender their driving licence for endorsement. If the driver does not accept the fixed penalty or surrender their licence, the case will be prosecuted through the courts. The court will instruct the driver to surrender their licence to the court in advance or bring it with them to the hearing. Within a few days of the hearing, the court notifies the DVLA of the outcome and whether or not the licence was surrendered.
	If the licence was not surrendered, the DVLA will advise the driver he has a further 28 days to comply before the licence is revoked. Licences surrendered to the DVLA within this 28-day period will be endorsed and returned. A driver who surrenders his licence after the licence has been revoked will have to submit an application to renew his driving entitlement. A new licence will then be issued within 15 days of the application being received at the DVLA.

Embryology

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Earl Howe on 12 November (WA 141) and 22 November (WA 263), which licensed centre was primarily responsible for the data in the journal Human Fertility (volume 10, issue 3, pages 183-7) which were previously presented to members of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) at the HFEA Research Licence Committee Meeting on 14 September 2006; and what percentage of the reported cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome that were considered to be adverse incidents had been reported as such to the HFEA by the same centre.

Earl Howe: The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has advised that the centre, at which the data published in the Human Fertility paper originated, is not identified in papers presented to the research licence committee. As the paper contains details of the particular clinical treatment of two individuals, the HFEA has also advised that it considers that confirming the identity of the centre could result in a breach of Section 33A of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, as amended, which protects the confidentiality of people to whom treatment services are provided. In relation to the reporting of cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome to the HFEA, the authority has advised that it has nothing to add to my Answer of 22 November 2010, Official Report, col. WA 263.

Embryology

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 22 November (WA 263-4), in what ways Bea Pavlovic had raised concerns with the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA); what were the immediate actions on the part of any employees of the HFEA in response to this; and what guidance has been provided by the HFEA with regard to whistleblowing activities.

Earl Howe: The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has advised that it would be inappropriate for it to add to information already in the public domain about a public interest disclosure case without the prior agreement of the person concerned. On the basis of concerns raised about Centre 0102, the HFEA carried out an unannounced inspection in February 2006. The HFEA's corporate policy on public interest disclosure is published on its website at: www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/2010-06-30_Public_Interests_Disclosure.pdf.

Embryology

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 22 November (WA 263-4), which centres licensed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority are known to hold treatment and research licences for which any of the same personnel are engaged in both activities; and for which centres is either the Person Responsible or the Nominal Licensee engaged in both the treatment of patients and research with embryos.

Earl Howe: The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has advised that an initial examination of the information it holds suggests that it may not be possible to determine accurately which of the licensable activities centre staff are authorised to carry out is actually carried out by each particular member of staff. The HFEA has advised that it will examine its records further and will write to me to confirm what relevant information the records show. I will write to the noble Lord when I receive this information and place a copy of that letter in the Library.

EU: Schengen Agreement

Lord Steel of Aikwood: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether, with a view to reducing costs to the economy and inconvenience to students, they will reconsider joining the Schengen agreement.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Government have no plans to join the visa and border control aspects of Schengen. Despite our position outside the Schengen travel area, the UK remains open for business. We are a highly attractive and competitive destination for investors, business travellers and students.

Fluoridation

Earl Baldwin of Bewdley: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the statements on the website of the National Fluoride Information Centre that claim benefits to adult teeth from water fluoridation, and in the February 2008 letter about water fluoridation from the Chief Dental Officer to strategic health authorities and others (Gateway 9361), citing Griffin et al (2007) for claimed benefits to the oral health of adults, have taken account of the criticisms of the Griffin review by NHS Evidence Oral Health available at www.library.nhs.uk/oralhealth/viewResources.aspx?resID=269963.[HL4558]

Earl Howe: We understand that the Chief Dental Officer was aware of criticisms of the Griffin report when he published the letter, but when the outcome of the judicial review of the decision made by South Central Strategic Health Authority to fluoridate Southampton is known, he will be issuing revised guidance which will take account of any new evidence on the effects of fluoridation.

Fluoridation

Earl Baldwin of Bewdley: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Lord Darzi of Denham on 20 May 2009 (WA 323-4) and by Earl Howe on 23 June 2010 (WA 187-8), whether the statement on the website of the National Fluoride Information Centre that there is "no evidence" of ill effects on general health from water fluoridation is an accurate summation.

Earl Howe: Yes, this observation remains accurate. There is no conclusive evidence of risks to systemic health from water fluoridated at the one part per million level used in fluoridation schemes in England.

Government Departments: Staff

Lord Bassam of Brighton: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many staff have been employed on temporary or short-term contracts since 12 May to support the Home Secretary; what are the names of those employed; at what grade and what level of remuneration they were employed; and what selection criteria were used to determine their suitability for the post.

Baroness Neville-Jones: Since 12 May 2010, the Home Office has appointed one official on a fixed-term contract to support the Secretary of State. The post is at SEO and the pay range for that grade is £33,953 to £39,537. The name of the individual and their exact salary are personal data and cannot be disclosed.
	The jobholder was appointed specifically for this role following a limited competition exercise. This is a temporary appointment which was not advertised. The Civil Service Commissioners' Recruitment Principles provide for departments to be able to recruit individuals, without advertising, for short-term appointments of up to two years to meet a short-term need.
	These principles are incorporated into departmental policies. The freeze on civil service recruitment is in respect of permanent employees.

Government Departments: Staff

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Taylor of Holbeach on 24 November (WA 342-3), whether they will publish the full lists of ministers and parliamentary private secretaries, their salaries and the number who are members of the House of Commons in the Official Report, rather than referring to where such lists may be found on the internet.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: I have written to the noble Lord with copies of the lists. The information has also been placed in the Libraries of the House.

Gross Domestic Product

Lord Barnett: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their latest estimate of the current percentage of gross domestic product represented by the National Debt.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
	Letter from Stephen Penneck, Director-General for the ONS, to Lord Barnett, dated November 2010.
	As Director General of the Office for National Statistics, I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question to Her Majesty's Government asking for the latest estimate of the current percentage of gross domestic product represented by the National Debt (HL4636).
	The Office for National Statistics and HM Treasury jointly publish estimates of Public Sector Net Debt (PSND) and Public Sector Net Debt excluding the temporary effects of financial interventions (PSND ex) in the Public Sector Finances Statistical Bulletin. PSND is calculated from financial balance sheets that are measured at nominal value so as to reflect the debt that will have to be repaid when gilts or other debt instruments mature. Assets are also recorded at nominal values. PSND is calculated as the difference between liabilities and liquid assets (currency, deposits, and short term securities).
	At end October 2010 PSND was estimated at £955.0 billion, equivalent to 64.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while PSND ex was estimated as £845.8 billion, equivalent to 57.1 per cent of GDP.
	An alternative measure of national debt is gross general government debt, which is reported to the European Commission, as required under the Maastricht Treaty. This differs from PSND insofar as it excludes the debts of public corporations and is a gross measure ie. liquid assets are not subtracted from liabilities to arrive at this measure. The most recently published estimate is that general government debt at end March 2010 was £1000.4 billion, equivalent to 71.3 per cent of GDP.

Health: Bladder and Bowel Care

Baroness Tonge: To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to commission services to treat bladder and bowel problems as one integrated service.

Earl Howe: The White Paper Liberating the NHS set out our proposals to devolve power and responsibility for commissioning services to local consortia of general practitioner (GP) practices.
	GPs play a crucial role in co-ordinating patient care and committing National Health Service resources through daily clinical decisions. Our proposals for this new model of commissioning draw on the regular contact that GPs have with patients and their more detailed understanding of patients' wider healthcare needs.
	We propose that GP consortia will be responsible for commissioning the great majority of NHS services. We will expect consortia to involve relevant health and social care professionals from all sectors in helping design care pathways or care packages that achieve more integrated delivery of care, higher quality, and more efficient use of NHS resources. This will create an effective dialogue across all health, and where appropriate, social care professionals.
	To support GP consortia in their commissioning decisions, we will also create an independent NHS commissioning board.
	Liberating the NHS: Commissioning for Patients invited views on a number of areas of the commissioning agenda. The engagement exercise closed on 11 October and the department is now analysing all of the contributions received.

Health: Bladder and Bowel Care

Baroness Tonge: To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to introduce a National Quality Standard on bladder and bowel care in children and young people.

Earl Howe: The case for developing a quality standard on bladder and bowel care in children and young people will be considered as part of work to commission a comprehensive library of such standards from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, in line with plans set out in the White Paper Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS.

Health: Blood Clots

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their response to the finding of the All-Party Parliamentary Thrombosis group that most hospitals are not assessing patients at risk of blood clots, and are not following agreed guidelines for prevention of such clots.

Earl Howe: The All-Party Parliamentary Thrombosis Group (APPTG) is an important partner for the National VTE Prevention Programme in England and we welcome the survey it carries out on an annual basis. The collection of data on venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment from National Health Service acute service providers started in June this year so it is very early days, and the department has pre-announced the date of 3 December 2010 for the publication of the second quarter data (July-September).
	From April this year all providers of acute services have been required to assess the risk of every adult patient on admission and from June providers have been required to report the numbers of patients receiving this risk assessment as a percentage of their total adult admissions. As these are recent developments we expect to see continuous improvement throughout the NHS in reducing the risk of avoidable death and disability from VTE. The 90 per cent National Commissioning for Quality and Innovation goal is rightly ambitious and we know that NHS acute service providers are putting enormous efforts into VTE prevention activities and most will be aiming to achieve the 90 per cent VTE risk assessment goal during January to March 2011.

Health: Head Lice

The Countess of Mar: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many NHS prescriptions were issued between January 2008 and June 2010 for the treatment of head lice by individual product; what was the cost of each product; and whether prescriptions issued by nurse prescribers and prescribing pharmacists running minor ailment schemes are included.

Earl Howe: Information on the number of prescription items written in the United Kingdom and dispensed in the community in England, for all head lice treatments, and the net ingredient cost, is shown in the following table. Prescriptions issued by nurse and pharmacists prescribers, which are dispensed, will be included in these figures. Any prescriptions issued as part of a minor ailment scheme, which are dispensed, would also be included in these figures. However, such schemes do not normally use prescriptions; rather, products are supplied directly to patients, and data on such supply are not collected centrally.
	
		
			 Number of prescription items written in the UK and dispensed in the community in England and the net ingredient cost (NIC)-January 2008 to June 2010 
			 Chemical name Product name Items NIC(£'s) 
			 Carbaryl Carylderm Liquid 1% 4,035 18,169 
			  Carylderm Liquid Shampoo 1% 1 5 
			  Carylderm Lotion 0.5% 312 1,411 
			 Carbaryl total  4,348 19,585 
			 Dimeticone (parasiticidal) Hedrin Lotion 4% 90,817 617,936 
			  Hedrin Lotion Spray 4% 100 ml 277 2,022 
			  Hedrin Lotion Spray 4% 120 ml 1,487 12,624 
			  Hedrin Lotion Spray 4% 60 ml 42 267 
			 Dimeticone parasiticidal total  92,623 632,849 
			 Malathion Derbac-M Liquid 0.5% 201,694 1,190,974 
			  Prioderm Cream Shampoo 1% 246 969 
			  Prioderm Lotion 0.5% 52,595 292,846 
			  Quellada-M Cream Shampoo 1% 3,607 14,312 
			  Quellada-M Liquid 0.5% 23,039 114,918 
			  Suleo-M Lotion 0.5% 525 2,892 
			 Malathion total  281,706 1,616,910 
			 Other parasiticidal preparations Nitty Gritty Head Lice Repellent Spray 250 ml 12 69 
			 Other parasiticidal preparations total  12 69 
			 Phenothrin Full Marks Foam Aero 0.5% 150g 2,059 14,438 
			  Full Marks Foam Aero 0.5% 50g 2,369 8,800 
			  Full Marks Liquid 0.5% 16,439 93,921 
			  Full Marks Lotion 0.2% 7,883 43,291 
			 Phenothrin total  28,750 160,450 
			 Combs Nitcomb-M2 Comb 691 1,567 
			  Nitcomb-S1 Comb 261 318 
			  Nitty Gritty NitFree Comb 12,408 73,098 
			 Combs total  13,360 74,982 
			 Grand total  420,799 2,504,846 
		
	
	Notes:
	1. Prescription information is taken from the prescription cost analysis (PCA) system.
	2. NIC is the basic cost of a drug. It does not take account of discounts, dispensing costs, fees or prescription charges income.
	3. The British National Formulary classifies treatment of head lice under paragraph 13.10.4 on parasiticidal preparations. Also included in this section are treatments for crab lice and scabies but these are not included in this response unless also suitable for treating head lice.
	4. A further treatment for head lice, which may be combined with chemical treatment, is the use of a special comb, information for which is included in the table.

Health: Incontinence

Baroness Tonge: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether an obligation will be placed on general practitioners to provide access to continence advisers as part of the switch to general practitioner commissioning proposed in the National Health Service White Paper Equity and Excellence.

Earl Howe: The White Paper Liberating the NHS set out our proposals to devolve power and responsibility for commissioning services to local consortia of general practitioner (GP) practices.
	GPs play a crucial role in co-ordinating patient care and committing National Health Service resources through daily clinical decisions. Our proposals for this new model of commissioning draw on the regular contact that GPs have with patients and their more detailed understanding of patients' wider healthcare needs.
	We propose that GP consortia will be responsible for commissioning the great majority of NHS services. We will expect consortia to involve relevant health and social care professionals from all sectors in helping design care pathways or care packages that achieve more integrated delivery of care, higher quality, and more efficient use of NHS resources. This will create an effective dialogue across all health, and where appropriate, social care professionals.
	To support GP consortia in their commissioning decisions, we will also create an independent NHS commissioning board.
	Liberating the NHS: Commissioning for Patients invited views on a number of areas of the commissioning agenda. The engagement exercise closed on 11 October and the department is now analysing all of the contributions received.

Higher Education: Funding

Lord Willis of Knaresborough: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the total annual resource allocated in each of the years 2005-06 to 2009-10 to support education of 16 to 19 year-olds in full-time education.

Lord Hill of Oareford: The table below shows the annual resource funding for 16 to 19 participation in education and training in each financial year from 2005-06 to 2009-10.
	The figures only include: the funding allocated to sixth forms in schools and further education (FE) institutions to support 16 to 19-year olds in education; the funding for the Entry to Employment programme; and 16 to 18 apprenticeships.
	
		
			 Financial Year 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 
			 TOTAL (£m) 5,278 5,613 5,921 6,247 6,788 
		
	
	The figures in the table do not include the participation funding allocated to support 16 to 25-year olds with learning difficulties and/or disabilities (LLDD). The funding highlighted supported both those in full-time and part-time learning. It is not possible to identify the historic levels of funding specifically supporting those in full-time education, as the 16 to 19 funding system operates to fund institutions as a whole rather than individual styles of learning programme.

Higher Education: Student Protests

Lord Palmer: To ask Her Majesty's Government what were the policing costs, including helicopter costs, of monitoring the student protests in London on 24 November.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Home Office does not hold this information.

Immigration

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether organisations will be able to exempt a migrant from the proposed immigration cap.

Baroness Neville-Jones: Organisations will not be able to exempt migrants from the limit on an ad hoc basis. Only specified exemptions will exist.
	As the Government announced on 23 November, the tier 2 (general) category of the points-based system will be subject to a limit of 20,700 places for 2011-12.
	The following will be exempt from the limit:
	specified in-country applications;dependants;tier 2 (intra-company transfer) applicants who will be paid more than £40,000, or where they are paid more than £24,000 and are coming for less than 12 months;tier 2 (general) applicants filling a vacancy that attracts a salary of more than £150,000;tier 2 (minister of religion) applicants; andtier 2 (sportsperson) applicants.
	There will also be a limit of 1,000 in the new exceptional talent category of tier 1 of the points-based system. Only dependants will be exempt from the limit for this category.
	The tier 1 categories for investors and entrepreneurs will not be limited.

Immigration

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the impact of the new immigration cap on the United Kingdom's economic growth.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Government will in due course publish an impact assessment on the changes we are making to economic migration routes.

Immigration: Detention

Lord Avebury: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many children were in immigration detention during each of the months of May to October 2010 inclusive; how many of those children were detained (a) prior to a decision to grant or refuse entry to the United Kingdom, (b) after they or their family member had been refused leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom but still had unexhausted rights of appeal against a decision to refuse leave to enter or remain, (c) after they or their family member had been made subject to deportation proceedings, and (d) after any appeal rights they or their family member had held had been exhausted.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The number of children entering detention as part of a family unit held under immigration powers May to October 2010 inclusively is provided in the attached table.
	No information is available which would distinguish between those families with children who were detained (a) prior to a decision to grant or refuse entry to the United Kingdom, (b) after they or their family member had been refused leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom but still had exhausted rights of appeal against a decision to refuse leave to enter or remain, (c) after they or their family member had been made subject to deportation proceedings, or (d) after any appeal rights they or their family member had held had been exhausted. The information requested could only be obtained by the detailed examination of individual case records at disproportionate cost.
	
		
			 Month (2010) Number of Children Detained as part of a Family 
			 May 40 
			 June 25 
			 July 15 
			 August 5 
			 September 15 
			 October 15

Immigration: Refugees

The Earl of Sandwich: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many refugees have been resettled in the United Kingdom under the auspices of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in the past three years; what monitoring has been carried out; and what is their estimate of (a) how many are unemployed, and (b) how many skilled refugees have been given employment.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The UK Border Agency works with the UNHCR to resettle to the UK up to 750 refugees per financial year, who have been identified as being in particular need of resettlement. Those resettled under the Gateway protection programme include former employees of the British forces in Iraq and many vulnerable refugees who have experienced rape, torture or have witnessed the killing of family members:
	total arrivals in 2007 calendar year 463;
	total arrivals in 2008 calendar year 642;
	total arrivals in 2009 calendar year 867;
	total arrivals in 2007-08 financial year 416;
	total arrivals in 2008-09 financial year 684; and
	total arrivals in 2009-10 financial year 677
	Resettlement figures for 2010 will only be published in Q4 2010 bulletin on 24 February 2011.
	UKBA at present meets the full cost of resettlement in the first year, providing an integration support package including housing, healthcare, education and casework support services. Most post-arrival services are provided by partner NGOs, who work closely with the participating local authorities. National figures relating to the employment of individuals entering the UK under the Gateway programme are not collected. We receive quarterly reports from participating NGOs which show that a very small proportion (10 per cent) of those resettled gain paid employment in the first year, although a number (25 per cent) undertake voluntary work. UKBA does not secure employment on behalf of resettled refugees. They are signposted to mainstream services and have the same opportunities as any other UK resident. We do not monitor Gateway refugees beyond the first year.

Police: Expenditure Cuts

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many police officers will lose their jobs as a result of Spending Review 2010.

Baroness Neville-Jones: Decisions about the number of police officers and other police staff engaged by the police service are a matter for individual chief constables and their police authorities. My right honourable friend the Home Secretary has been clear that the police service must play its part in reducing the deficit. Details of the Government's provisional funding allocations for individual forces will be placed before Parliament in early December.

Police: Expenditure Cuts

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many police forces have stopped recruiting officers due to the spending cuts.

Baroness Neville-Jones: This information is not held centrally. It is a matter for individual chief constables and their police authorities.

Railways: Ebbw Vale Railway

Lord Touhig: To ask Her Majesty's Government what impact Spending Review 2010 will have on phase two of the Ebbw Vale Railway project and the reopening of the Gaer Junction.

Earl Attlee: This is a matter for the Welsh Assembly Government.

Railways: Ebbw Vale Railway

Lord Touhig: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will continue with phase two of the Ebbw Vale Railway project and the reopening of the Gaer Junction.

Earl Attlee: All phases of the Ebbw Vale Railway project are a matter for the Welsh Assembly Government.

Railways: Ticketing

Lord Bradshaw: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Attlee on 11 November (WA 132-3), when they became aware of the shortcomings of South West Trains in respect of queuing times at the booking offices concerned; how they became aware of these shortcomings; and when they expect remedial action to be taken by South West Trains.

Earl Attlee: Officials at the Department for Transport first became aware of this issue at Guildford station from correspondence from a member of the public in July 2008. This was further supplemented by Passenger Focus's report highlighting the three stations to which my noble friend refers. South West Trains has been taking remedial action to improve queue times at these stations throughout 2010.
	Officials will continue to keep this under review.

Schools: GCSEs

Lord Quirk: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hill of Oareford on 1 November (WA 367-8), how they propose to respond to the decline in the number of pupils entered for GCSE examinations in foreign languages in English schools throughout the period 1995-2009.

Lord Hill of Oareford: The Government believe that learning a language is important to the social and economic future of the country and to help children understand the world in which they live. We will be announcing more details about a review of the national curriculum later this year. This review will consider the status of languages at both primary and secondary level. We plan to consult a wide range of academics, teachers and other interested parties to ensure that our core curriculum can compare favourably with those of the highest performing countries in the world.
	On 6 September, in a speech at Westminster Academy, the Secretary of State announced an English Baccalaureate, to include a modern or ancient language as one of the core academic subjects that children should learn at GCSE level, along with English, maths, science and a humanity subject. We expect this to lead to an increase in take up of languages at key stage 4. Detailed proposals will be announced later this year.

Schools: Languages

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to make the learning of a foreign language compulsory at GCSE level.

Lord Hill of Oareford: The Government believe that learning a language is important to the social and economic future of the country and to help children understand the world in which they live. We will be announcing more details about a review of the national curriculum shortly. This review will consider the status of languages at both primary and secondary level. We plan to consult a wide range of academics, teachers and other interested parties to ensure that our core curriculum can compare with those of the highest-performing countries in the world.
	The Government's White Paper The Importance of Teaching, published on 24 November, sets out our plans to encourage all schools to offer a broad set of academic subjects to students aged 16, including an ancient or modern language. We will give special recognition in performance tables to those schools which are helping their pupils attain this breadth and we will mark individual students' achievements through a certificate.

Schools: Reading

Lord Dykes: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the latest advances in using computer technology to promote young learners' reading skills in primary schools.

Lord Hill of Oareford: We have not made an assessment of the use of computer technology to promote children's reading skills. It is for individual schools to determine the extent to which they make use of technology in teaching early reading.
	There are a number of phonics products on the market which make use of technology to support early reading. As long as a product adheres to the revised core criteria recently published by the department, schools are free to choose which one they use.

South Wales Police

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the total financial remuneration from Police Authority funds for each appointed member of the South Wales Police Authority in each of the past six years.

Baroness Neville-Jones: This information is not held centrally.

UK Borders Act 2007

The Countess of Mar: To ask Her Majesty's Government which powers, purposes and sanctions under Sections 5-15 of the UK Borders Act 2007 are over and above the requirements of European Union law.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The UK Borders Act 2007 enables the Secretary of State to make regulations to roll out biometric residence permits that go beyond the requirements of the EU regulation. To date the current regulations have enabled biometric residence permits to be issued only to categories of migrants covered by the EU legislation. All regulations under the Act are subject to scrutiny and approval of both Houses of Parliament.

Visas

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government why workers given work permit visas to enter the United Kingdom on inter-company transfers for less than 12 months need earn only £24,000 when a figure of £40,000 is proposed for transfers longer than a year; and how many such visas were issued last year above and below earnings of £24,000.

Baroness Neville-Jones: As the Home Secretary stated on 23 November, the Government have listened to business concerns about intra-company transfers. We accept that business needs the ability to transfer key staff for short periods.
	The new salary threshold of £40,000 for any intra-company transfers of longer than 12 months will ensure those coming for longer periods are only senior managers and key specialists.
	Of the intra-company transfer visa applicants sponsored for employment of 12 months or less in 2009, 1,835 had a salary below £24,000 and 6,915 had a salary of £24,000 and above.